Categories
Other

Mobile only web design

Before, there were no smart phones, and web design was tailored to the computer screen. Then smart phones and tablets happened. Regular old web didn’t work so well on those, so the design became responsive and adapting to device screens. That often works well when someone actually cares about larger screen variants and implements dedicated layouts and styling.

Then mobile first happened.

Design for the mobile first and foremost, then consider designs for larger and wider screens as an afterthought. Too often it is actually mobile only design. Target the phones, and just forget about everything else. (Hell, just forget about the web entirely and force visitors to install an app, mhm ? Fuck that by the way.)

A mobile only web design may visually scale up without becoming ugly, but totally fail to take advantage of a larger screen with precise pointing device and a physical keyboard available. There is often too much wasted space; too much air, too big fonts, too big click (tap) targets and content hidden behind interactive revealing widgets. Too much imagery and visual design crap that actually drains mobile batteries faster. It becomes annoying to visit from a desktop.

In a mobile only web design, the menu is typically not directly visible, because it would take up too much space. So it requires interaction with a hamburger widget of some sort, which will reveal the menu items in huge font, typically covering whatever page is underneath completely. An anemic site map of sorts, because a real site map is just too much content. This is useless on a bigger screen – direct access to all menu items is much better. Similarly, other space saving measures just cripple the user experience on big screen, because of the narrow constraints. See the irony by the way ? The very WordPress theme I use on this site has some of those traits I do not like. (The newer ones are even more horrible, so I’m stuck with the lesser evil.)

Another common space saving measure is the Show more.. widgets. Instead of just laying out all the content and let users naturally ignore, scroll or flick past uninteresting stuff, the interface requires extra interactions while reading. When I’ve opened the next page of a book, I don’t want to be forced to do things with that page to read it. I just want to read it, skim it or skip it.

By all means, it makes very much sense to create mobile designs, but please don’t forget that the web is at its best when accessible on a variety of devices, including *OMG* actual computers with big screens.

I will end this rant by paying tribute to another lovely rant that explains this much more eloquently:
https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

Categories
Other

Shall I gift wrap your browser monopoly, sir ?

Back in 2019 I write a post about the importance of supporting the Mozilla Firefox web browser:

I think standards are hugely important to keeping the web open and accessible for all, and I strongly dislike browser engine monopolies. Web publishing needs diversity in applications which consume, process and present the data, as a force that pulls it towards agreed upon and open standards.

https://stegard.net/2019/01/why-you-should-use-mozilla-firefox/

Fast forward three years, and the web is even closer to complete Google domination, with Firefox usage on the decline. By that, I mean Google controlling a browser with a market share close to 65%[1], and that’s not including all the Blink engine Chrome clones out there. If we include all of those browsers, the market share is over 70%[1]. Compare that with Mozilla Firefox’ current 3.3%[1] market share – and you get a truly unfortunate story. If you want a history lesson, in case you are too young to remember, check out the First browser war[3]. The bottom line is that it’s rarely, if ever, a good thing when a single profit driven entity controls important technology world wide at this scale. It takes away your freedom. The open web of information should belong the people and not corporations using the people as products.

I recently stumbled across a YouTuber by the name of Gardiner Bryant, and he has published a video where he elaborates on the issue of browser and web tech domination. I urge you to watch it and make up your own mind:

Video poster
Gardiner Bryant – Firefox is on the verge of extinction. What can they do about it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xvtz3pN_Sw

I say well said. And in case you had forgotten; Mozilla Firefox is still a great open source browser, and you really need no political reasons to use and support it.

References

  1. https://gs.statcounter.com/, at time of publication
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xvtz3pN_Sw
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars#First_Browser_War_(1995%E2%80%932001)
Categories
Other

Web Warts

A web wart is a type of Modal, Popup, Drop-down, Slide-in, Banner, Useless widget or other Annoying element that comes to greet you on your visit to a web page; there are many shapes and sizes. First time visitors are particularly susceptible to wart attacks. Many such warts can be removed by striking their weak spot, often a small [x]. If you do not pay attention to them, they persist, eat page space and proliferate. Web warts tend to reappear after a few days and can be hard to fully get rid of. Some you cannot remove, and some of those even tag along as you scroll the page.

A very common type of web wart is the Cookie Monster Modal that begs of you to Accept all. Such warts offer several options for you to annihilate them, but if you do not choose their own preferred way of dying, they will often come back the next day or next week or next month.

Every day the warts of the web increase in numbers. Landing on a new web site is like encountering an impenetrable wall of weeds. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to whack it all away, equipped with a pointy weapon. More often than not, your best bet is to just leave. There are many sources of truth these days.

I hate Web Warts.